Search for: All records

Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of short-term (~1 y) drought events—the most common duration of drought—globally. Yet the impact of this intensification of drought on ecosystem functioning remains poorly resolved. This is due in part to the widely disparate approaches ecologists have employed to study drought, variation in the severity and duration of drought studied, and differences among ecosystems in vegetation, edaphic and climatic attributes that can mediate drought impacts. To overcome these problems and better identify the factors that modulate drought responses, we used a coordinated distributed experiment to quantify the impact of short-term drought on grassland and shrubland ecosystems. With a standardized approach, we imposed ~a single year of drought at 100 sites on six continents. Here we show that loss of a foundational ecosystem function—aboveground net primary production (ANPP)—was 60% greater at sites that experienced statistically extreme drought (1-in-100-y event) vs. those sites where drought was nominal (historically more common) in magnitude (35% vs. 21%, respectively). This reduction in a key carbon cycle process with a single year of extreme drought greatly exceeds previously reported losses for grasslands and shrublands. Our global experiment also revealed high variability in drought response but that relative reductions in ANPP were greater in drier ecosystems and those with fewer plant species. Overall, our results demonstrate with unprecedented rigor that the global impacts of projected increases in drought severity have been significantly underestimated and that drier and less diverse sites are likely to be most vulnerable to extreme drought. 

Abstract. Long-term environmental research networks are one approach toadvancing local, regional, and global environmental science and education. Aremarkable number and wide variety of environmental research networks operatearound the world today. These are diverse in funding, infrastructure,motivating questions, scientific strengths, and the sciences that birthed andmaintain the networks. Some networks have individual sites that wereselected because they had produced invaluable long-term data, while othernetworks have new sites selected to span ecological gradients. However, alllong-term environmental networks share two challenges. Networks must keeppace with scientific advances and interact with both the scientific communityand society at large. If networks fall short of successfully addressing thesechallenges, they risk becoming irrelevant. The objective of this paper is toassert that the biogeosciences offer environmental research networks a numberof opportunities to expand scientific impact and public engagement. Weexplore some of these opportunities with four networks: the InternationalLong-Term Ecological Research Network programs (ILTERs), critical zoneobservatories (CZOs), Earth and ecological observatory networks (EONs),and the FLUXNET program of eddy flux sites. While these networks were foundedand expanded by interdisciplinary scientists, the preponderance of expertise andfunding has gravitated activities of ILTERs and EONs toward ecology andbiology, CZOs toward the Earth sciences and geology, and FLUXNET towardecophysiology and micrometeorology. Our point is not to homogenize networks,nor to diminish disciplinary science. Rather, we argue that by more fullyincorporating the integration of biology and geology in long-termenvironmental research networks, scientists can better leverage networkassets, keep pace with the ever-changing science of the environment, andengage with larger scientific and public audiences.